At the 2021 4TU.Ethics bi-annual conference on Ethics and Technology we, a group of 4TU.Ethics PhDs, decided to give the conferenceās motto āITāS ALIVEā a twist. In our symposium āItās out of the boxā, we had just one rule ā break as many rules as possible; discursive rules, that is.Ā
Our hypothesis wasāfor someāprovocative. But it was actually quite simple:
To the so-called 'digital natives', the boundaries between the way we communicate in 'real life' and using novel ICTs are becoming less and less clear. In contrast to the baby-boomer generation/Generation X, (digital) technologies do not change how digital natives interact with the world, but rather construct it from the very beginning of their socialization.
As a result of being accustomed to these modern means of communication, young scholars can have new, out of the box approaches to the philosophy and ethics of technology. To express these out of the box conceptions of technology, we need to break the boundaries of the language that we use to talk about technology. Or in the words of Marshall McLuhan: "the medium is the message".
In this spirit, the symposium was an experiment in academic and philosophical communication. Presentations consisted of memes (and drawings) only. We held nine short pitches, instead of three not-so-short talks. And each presentation delivered one concise 'take-home message' on the Ph.D. candidateās dissertation project. No more, no less.
Ludwig Wittgenstein once said that āa serious and good philosophical work could be written consisting entirely of jokesā. While the verdict on that is still open, we now know that a serious and good philosophical conference presentation could be written consistingāat least in partāof memes.